I like observing peoples, cities and cultures in all their ages and phases, mixing it up with great food (Better, if I cook!), wine and music (Love Karaoke nights!), photographing it (even if not with finesse :P), and finally reviewing it all through my Pen and Keyboard! It's all off-the-head.. Things skimming on top are spilt here in a space of 10 mins! Feedback's welcome!
Thursday, 26 April 2012
The Runaway (from) Bride .. and Family pride!
By show of hands, how many Indians in their 20s, living with their parents, get dragged at least twice a year to weddings of people they never have seen or heard of in their conscious memory, but their parents are inexplicably linked to?
I describe the link as "inexplicable" because unarmed with my mock-test training for the logical reasoning section of the law school entrance exams I took six years ago (which insisted the test-taker identify their direct relationship with the hypothetical aunt of an uncle's sister who is the mother of their dad's nephew's wife's brother), I would've been awfully ill-equipped at deciphering my genetic or more-based link to the hosts of the evening.
This morning I stomped my final and irrevocable rejection of one such wedding invitation (Farman, instead of "invitation" would be a more accurate term here, actually) for this evening, upon my mother.
Show of hands again, how many Indians in their 20s, and teens, and 40s, and 30s and 80s, and any age apart from the single digits basically (in which period the docile young Indian is "pleasing" and "compliant"), regularly play negative protagonists in the staged performances of the drama queen that is their mother?
The invitation arrived two weeks ago. Dressed รก la mode in the most in-vogue dazzling golden envelope, bejeweled with.. well what seemed like precious jewels, and accompanied by what I trust to be at least a kilogram of almonds, in a similarly bejeweled box. Each such invitation costs around Rs 700, I learned elsewhere.
It was the wedding of the daughter of my mother's cousin. This cousin last chit-chatted with mum presumably at mum's own wedding-reception, way back in 1987, in the slick ritual of being on and off the stage showcasing the betrothed, in the perfectly timed span of 165 seconds. These 165 seconds include introductions, handing over wedding gift/gift-envelope, getting clicked with the betrothed, and confirming to the hosts that dinner along with dessert has been had.
The invitation was received at my grandmother's since the hosts could afford only so much trips to one part of the town, and understandably so, given the list of 25 lakh (Kidding, there would have been only 25000 ... ummm or a similar figure!) invitees they had to cover in a week. I talk of affordability time-wise ofcourse! Who's talking about car-fuel, and physical energy.. hello 25 lakh invites at 700/- per person!!
My mother had launched into her aggressive bargaining initiative for me to accompany my folks to this wedding, from a week ago. Initially she alternated between lighter arguments about it being a celebrity wedding, and it being an opportunity to try on a frivolous new ethnic-suit purchase while learning in advance about wedding arrangements (If you think THAT'S ridiculous - My "marriagiable" cousin gets a "Why would they come to yours if you don't attend theirs" blurb for the many many weddings she'd rather skip accompanying her parents to, these days!!)
End of the week mum moved on to pithier contentions about family solidarity, balancing selfishness with social duties and finally, this morning, the trump card of them all - emotional blackmail! I was allegedly too self-absorbed to meet the humane requirement of unconditionally subscribing to the few subscriptions my parents impose on me.
I did not relent. I suspect my mother was more troubled at the end of an era, than at my disregard. An era where she vetoed as far as my choice of outfit for these events. If I may borrow some of morning's drama flavor to put this straight - this was the death knell to the part of our lives in which she had quite fondly shaped mine. It was not, really, but overtly seemed so.
The reason why I so adamantly stood by my so-called brutish selfish stand was that my aversion to the idea of such invitations, at every level - be it physical or by-principle - overcame a gnawing urge to be considerate and let my kind mother revel in her triumph at what must seem to her as keeping the family bond.
I couldn't bear the thought of going through another evening of whittling down post-office hours being snail-mailed (read: Navigating Delhi Ring Road and BRT in peak evening hours) to a ceremony which makes up for the only time I see the hosts in my life, and what for - so that my mother's immediate family doesn't badger her with opinions on full-family attendance at events of such importance!
I do like meeting new people and possibly engage them in an interesting conversation, but that remote possibility has a success rating of one per cent in these affairs where most others come reeling under similar family-pressure as illustrated above, and dart for the food and drink more than anything else.
Some of my entertaining cousins I don't mind catching up with were also not going to be in attendance. The duller ones would!
End result, the evening looks like this: You wrap up office, spend 20 minutes dressing up, an hour travelling, two hours of cornering a table and gazing into eternity or at parts of the wedding that seem like eternity (interrupted by delicious hors d'eouvers ofcourse), and an hour of travelling back home. Come back and bunk onto bed.
I am a 23 year old woman attempting a shot at making it to the life I always wanted to live, and so my evenings look this: After wrapping up office work, I enjoy some my-time at the gym, then spend my-time on extensions of things I have recently learned to love doing professionally. I wrap this up with curling up with my-kinda pleasure reads or pleasure writing, and hit the sack.
I would not paraphrase all my "my"s above, with a more politically correct, so to speak, expression because I revel in my rightful self-obsession. To quote liberally from dogmas - One will be incapable of loving others in their life without learning to love themselves enough.
I would also note that my own wedding would involve none of the traditional fanfare that I have witnessed over years and years of growing up in the family. Any mother's cousin who couldn't spot my dad from among a group of strangers at a family funeral, but invites the full family to her daughter's wedding a week later, would have no business attending :P
Most of all I resent having to take my decisions under the pressure of opinions of uncles who after 101 million polite discourses still don't get why I love doing what I do to earn my livelihood, and urge me to change my professional choices.
Why do I not take this self-obsession outside, to where I pay my own rent? Because I am the kind of person who loves coming home to someone you call your own. At the risk of sounding overbearing, a live-in friend or housemate, no matter how pleasant and lovely, is not someone I can really call my own.
The number of people one sheds all masks and outfits are countable on the fingers of one hand. I love cuddling with mum after office, sharing jokes with dad and yelling at my brother. I would love someday to make a home with a husband. You can never have enough of grandma's pampering and a friend I have outgrown my childhood jeans with, is also palpable. These are the people I call my own, and these are the only people who can justifiably claim to know who I am.
I wish to share a home with them, instead of coming back to a mere house, because life is too short to spend living away from your loved ones. I am also ready to bear the costs of such home-sharing in the form of catering to unreasonable whims of these people.
Bring it on, on the weekends but!
I just can't bring myself to tow the line of subscriptions... And more importantly I can't spend an excruciating evening fulfilling the social duty of witnessing random Delhi weddings :P
Saturday, 24 March 2012
The Inevitable Goodness-Evils
I am about to judge a blogging competition, and in the spirit of fairness I thought it is a good idea for the judge to walk the blog space awhile in the shoes of the judged. So I am regaining the joy of whimsical unedited writing, under the pretext of getting a fresh taste of the blog pill, my last tryst with blogging coming from as far as 6 months ago.
This blog post is inspired from overheard bits of papa's phone conversation about meditation - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's (SSRS)The Art of Living way of meditation, to be precise. A relative had called him seeking advice and information about SSRS's cult, and my dad, in the course of relating his experiences at and after the three week-long meditation courses he had undertaken, dropped some mull-worthy bytes for me when I was already chewing epiphanies of my own since last night.
Papa said that even though he had enjoyed the buzz of blankness and calmness which this meditation had indeed effectively helped him experience mentally, the part that ticked him off was where the people associated with the organisation started behaving like a zen-addicted sect that owed the soundness of every breath they took to the blessings of Guruji (SSRS). "Jaigurudev!" (which is signature SSRS-club greeting) they'd say, and then gleefully launch into an "Oh look you were able to find yourself a parking spot at the centre on a Sunday! It is all Guruji's blessing!", recollected Papa, confessing to me later of wondering at that point if Gurudev himself would have been able to find himself a parking spot each time on a Sunday with the power of all his blessings?!?
We, me and Papa, do not discount the bliss arising from the sense of a guiding power over your head that gives you the confidence to calmly solve problems in your life. Even as I wrote this, a friend messaged me saying how a series of kitchen accidents that subsumed my morning today were a result of my thoughts being elsewhere. Reading that message I desperately wished to achieve a more stable state of existence than that!
But, Papa and I are wary of an addiction to such a stable state's quest itself. An addiction that makes us obsessively do everything SSRS tells us to do to realize the zen-like effect we end up being so addicted to. So, for instance, SSRS tells us that to successfully achieve complete inner calm we must do all of this - meditate for 20 minutes in the morning on an empty stomach everyday and visit the meditation centre every Sunday for the longer routine, regularly volunteer in the organisation of Art of Living (AOL) events, and donate resources and time for AOL sponsored social projects. A manic zeal to achieve all these goals at any cost, regardless of a greater demand for our time and resource coming from significant work and people around us, becomes the new peace-and-calm robbing source in our lives.
Again, I am not against making a sincere effort to achieve goodness in our lives. We must. But, attachment to goodness.. that is a sure-shot repellent for me. Papa has been maintaining a safe distance from a lot of the "recommended practices" of AOL for about six months now.. he said the aggressive whiz of it all makes him sometimes fear if he is being sucked into the "whirlpool of the mad (making him AS mad, by implication)", which is when he likes to take a step backward.
What would I like to take a step backward from? Last night I was mulling one such goodness the latest professional development in my life exposes me to. Popular recognition. "Trending" is the twitter term for it, I learn in my increasing consciousness to this and other social media tools - amplifiers to your voice box and to the voices in your head! Choosing journalism as a career, doesn't let me get addicted to making piles of money, for obvious reasons, consequently letting me focus all my energies on winning Name'N'fame!
Also, the cut for name and fame has undergone a remarkable alteration since I checked last. "Twitter has changed the definition of a celebrity", someone commented at a gathering the other day as he committed to another guest that he'll "follow" her! So on twitter I hang around in the company of fellow journalists who find a compulsive need to tweet the drop of a hat, especially when the hat dropped is a Yves Saint Laurent worn to an illuminati gathering they are exclusively covering! And though, I am likely not to post this piece of pleasure documentation on to twitter, I do flip-flop with the decision for more than a passing second.
I justify posting it up, telling myself that it educates readers about an important conclusion I drew about life, when the truth really is that it entertains me more than my readers, and knowing of its outreach to readers is also more about the hedonistic pleasure of being read, rather than about the satisfaction of fulfilling the social purpose of educating anyone! Ah, ironies!
Now the thing that is irksome about hedonistic attachment to any goodness, be it meditative states, money, fame or anything else, is that life becomes a roller coaster of diabolically erratic ups and downs henceforth. Because success is a relative measure. No amount of goodness will ever be enough once you're attached to it, and no goodness, like everything else in this world, is permanent. When the temporary goes away, it is the attached who is crestfallen, while it is the oblivious who picks up the pieces and carries on without damage. My examples about tweeting journalists and writers are obviously the tip of the iceberg, and the extreme thirst for fame knows no bounds.
But then, We the Mango People... we, and not a Mother Teresa or a Florence Nightingale or a Mahatma Gandhi.. we choose our career paths according to the life-goodness we individually crave most for,some crave money, others power, and some name-recognition. A lot of us try and imbibe the school-blackboard quotation, "make your hobby your career and you will never have to work a single day", into our lives and make earn a living out of the art we love contributing to. But our ambitions with that art.... again, guided by either money-thirst, power-thirst, or fame-thirst... combined with a partial sense of social responsibility in a lot many cases, BUT never free from the thirst!
Therefore, being sucked in by either, sometimes a combination of more than one, goodness-evil is but inevitable, if one is at all ambitious.
This blog post is inspired from overheard bits of papa's phone conversation about meditation - Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's (SSRS)The Art of Living way of meditation, to be precise. A relative had called him seeking advice and information about SSRS's cult, and my dad, in the course of relating his experiences at and after the three week-long meditation courses he had undertaken, dropped some mull-worthy bytes for me when I was already chewing epiphanies of my own since last night.
Papa said that even though he had enjoyed the buzz of blankness and calmness which this meditation had indeed effectively helped him experience mentally, the part that ticked him off was where the people associated with the organisation started behaving like a zen-addicted sect that owed the soundness of every breath they took to the blessings of Guruji (SSRS). "Jaigurudev!" (which is signature SSRS-club greeting) they'd say, and then gleefully launch into an "Oh look you were able to find yourself a parking spot at the centre on a Sunday! It is all Guruji's blessing!", recollected Papa, confessing to me later of wondering at that point if Gurudev himself would have been able to find himself a parking spot each time on a Sunday with the power of all his blessings?!?
We, me and Papa, do not discount the bliss arising from the sense of a guiding power over your head that gives you the confidence to calmly solve problems in your life. Even as I wrote this, a friend messaged me saying how a series of kitchen accidents that subsumed my morning today were a result of my thoughts being elsewhere. Reading that message I desperately wished to achieve a more stable state of existence than that!
But, Papa and I are wary of an addiction to such a stable state's quest itself. An addiction that makes us obsessively do everything SSRS tells us to do to realize the zen-like effect we end up being so addicted to. So, for instance, SSRS tells us that to successfully achieve complete inner calm we must do all of this - meditate for 20 minutes in the morning on an empty stomach everyday and visit the meditation centre every Sunday for the longer routine, regularly volunteer in the organisation of Art of Living (AOL) events, and donate resources and time for AOL sponsored social projects. A manic zeal to achieve all these goals at any cost, regardless of a greater demand for our time and resource coming from significant work and people around us, becomes the new peace-and-calm robbing source in our lives.
Again, I am not against making a sincere effort to achieve goodness in our lives. We must. But, attachment to goodness.. that is a sure-shot repellent for me. Papa has been maintaining a safe distance from a lot of the "recommended practices" of AOL for about six months now.. he said the aggressive whiz of it all makes him sometimes fear if he is being sucked into the "whirlpool of the mad (making him AS mad, by implication)", which is when he likes to take a step backward.
What would I like to take a step backward from? Last night I was mulling one such goodness the latest professional development in my life exposes me to. Popular recognition. "Trending" is the twitter term for it, I learn in my increasing consciousness to this and other social media tools - amplifiers to your voice box and to the voices in your head! Choosing journalism as a career, doesn't let me get addicted to making piles of money, for obvious reasons, consequently letting me focus all my energies on winning Name'N'fame!
Also, the cut for name and fame has undergone a remarkable alteration since I checked last. "Twitter has changed the definition of a celebrity", someone commented at a gathering the other day as he committed to another guest that he'll "follow" her! So on twitter I hang around in the company of fellow journalists who find a compulsive need to tweet the drop of a hat, especially when the hat dropped is a Yves Saint Laurent worn to an illuminati gathering they are exclusively covering! And though, I am likely not to post this piece of pleasure documentation on to twitter, I do flip-flop with the decision for more than a passing second.
I justify posting it up, telling myself that it educates readers about an important conclusion I drew about life, when the truth really is that it entertains me more than my readers, and knowing of its outreach to readers is also more about the hedonistic pleasure of being read, rather than about the satisfaction of fulfilling the social purpose of educating anyone! Ah, ironies!
Now the thing that is irksome about hedonistic attachment to any goodness, be it meditative states, money, fame or anything else, is that life becomes a roller coaster of diabolically erratic ups and downs henceforth. Because success is a relative measure. No amount of goodness will ever be enough once you're attached to it, and no goodness, like everything else in this world, is permanent. When the temporary goes away, it is the attached who is crestfallen, while it is the oblivious who picks up the pieces and carries on without damage. My examples about tweeting journalists and writers are obviously the tip of the iceberg, and the extreme thirst for fame knows no bounds.
But then, We the Mango People... we, and not a Mother Teresa or a Florence Nightingale or a Mahatma Gandhi.. we choose our career paths according to the life-goodness we individually crave most for,some crave money, others power, and some name-recognition. A lot of us try and imbibe the school-blackboard quotation, "make your hobby your career and you will never have to work a single day", into our lives and make earn a living out of the art we love contributing to. But our ambitions with that art.... again, guided by either money-thirst, power-thirst, or fame-thirst... combined with a partial sense of social responsibility in a lot many cases, BUT never free from the thirst!
Therefore, being sucked in by either, sometimes a combination of more than one, goodness-evil is but inevitable, if one is at all ambitious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)